... and it really doesn't sit too well with me. But I need to realize it was only a TV show, not real history. But watching the original
Star Trek as far back as I can humanly remember, this movie seems a bit like history revision. I read somewhere that the movie was to be a "reboot" of the
Star Trek franchise. In doing this, and without giving too much away, the story calls for a change in the timeline in the 23rd century... so I guess it wouldn't be history revision. It was revised before it became history.
Anyone who knows me knows I'm a big Star Trek fan. I don't dress up in the ears or costumes and attend conventions (I will confess I did dress up as Capt. Kirk for Halloween one year). But from watching the show for 40 years, I've come to learn much about it and its characters. The one thing about the series in the 1960s was that it held a lot of consistency. More so that any other TV show of the time. That also continued into the Next Generation series. But the new movie loses some of this consistency. Over all it was good move, but if I were the producer, I would have made a few changes that could have maintained the original Trek story.
Spoiler Alert. Don't read any further if you haven't seen the movie yet or Star Trek doesn't interest you.
The main change I would make would be the removal of the Uhura, Sulu and Chekov characters. In the movie, the story is set during Kirk's days in Starfleet Academy. Uhura, Sulu and Checkov were a few years younger than Kirk. There was no way they would attend the Academy at the same time. Instead, the movie showed Sulu and Chekov as commissioned bridge officers on the Enterprise, while Kirk was still technically a cadet. I would have brought them in in a second prequel movie, if any.
I would have made minor changes with Spock, McCoy and Scotty. Come on... in the movie, Kirk was still a cadet, but Spock held the rank of Commander. That was his rank in the original series in the 60's. So you mean to tell me Spock had stayed a Commander for 12-13 years with no promotion.
There were many other things that did not stay consistent with the original series, but that can largely be explained by the timeline being changed.
I did enjoy when Kirk's parents were deciding on a name for the future captain of the Enterprise. The special effects were great. The casting was done very well as the actors portrayed their iconic roles almost like the originals (Dr. "Bones" McCoy was exceptional). I liked the fact they kept the usual catchphrases (ie "I've given her all she's got, Captain"). I also liked the fact that they kept the same, although improved, Starfleet uniforms from the 60's original.
I really didn't like the fact how Kirk became captain so quickly. And Captain Pike's timeline was largely changed. It appeared Kirk took command away from him. In the original Trek, Kirk mentioned that he met Christopher Pike only once. Additionally, I did not approve the fact that the planet Vulcan was destroyed. That will be a major change in the Federation for the 23rd and 24th centuries.
But then again, it's only a TV show/movie... "get a life!"